About Us  |   Advertise  |   Contact Us  |   Terms & Conditions  |   RSS Feeds
deposit rates

Moratoria slow-death for finance companies rather than quick: Diplock

Securities Commission chairman Jane Diplock has lamented investors' unwillingness to cut their losses and walk away from failed ventures, resulting in a number of finance companies going into moratorium when receivership would have been a better option.

Thursday, 24 September 2009

by Paul McBeth

Speaking at Parliament's Commerce Committee, Diplock said investors are too optimistic about the prospect of regaining lost money and have been easily led to accept putting a company into moratorium when receivership would be a better option.

"I think that investors are often very optimistic and reluctant to crystallise the loss even in their own mind," Diplock said. "They want to hear the company will somehow get back to life."

The regulator was scathing on the prospects for most finance companies operating in moratoria, saying the proposals are "usually the slow-death of the company rather than the quick death of the company."

Still, Diplock would not want to remove the option from distressed firms altogether, as there are some that can survive long enough to trade their way out of trouble.

The commission is currently looking into ways to improve moratoria proposals, such as requiring a very short, heavily prescribed disclosure document explaining to investors how directors believe a moratorium would make the company solvent. In conjunction with this, the company's trustee would have to give its views on the merit of the offer.

One of Diplock's main concerns is around the related-party involvement in moratoria, and the financial benefits management often has in keeping a company operating. Still, she admitted it would be difficult to introduce independent assessors of the schemes due to cost constraints.

The government recently announced new rules for finance companies seeking a moratorium, which will require clear and concise investment statements about the proposed terms to freeze funds, along with independent advice and the views of trustees and company directors.

Similarly, as part of its wider inquiry into finance companies, the Commerce Committee will be looking into whether management should be able to retain their positions if they enter moratorium.

 

Commenting is closed

print

Printable version

print

Email to a friend
Newsletter Signup

Weekly Updates including news and commentary

Today's Best Bank Rates
Rabobank 0.75
Based on a $50,000 deposit    More Rates »
Today's Top 5 Deposit Rates
InstitutionRateProduct
NZCU Auckland 1.00 Success Saver
First Credit Union 0.75 Online Savings
Rabobank 0.75 Rabobank PremiumSaver - max rate
Heretaunga Building Society 0.60 On Call
NZCU Baywide 0.60 Success Saver
Based on a $50,000 deposit    More Rates »
Find a Rate
Show me the rates for
$
invested over
Use the full calculator
Cash PIE Rates
Institution Rate 30% 33%
ANZ 0.10 0.10 0.11
ASB Bank 0.15 0.16 0.17
ASB Bank 0.15 0.16 0.17
ASB Bank 0.15 0.16 0.17
ASB Bank 0.15 0.16 0.17
ASB Bank 0.15 0.16 0.17
BNZ 0.10 0.10 0.10
Heartland Bank 0.40 0.40 0.40
Kiwibank 0.05 - -
Kiwibank 0.25 - -
Nelson Building Society - - -
SBS Bank - - -
TSB Bank 0.25 0.25 0.26
Westpac 0.20 0.21 0.23
Westpac 0.05 0.05 0.05
Westpac 0.25 0.26 0.27

More »

Previous News
Latest Trends
Coming Soon
MORE »

Disclaimer - Every possible effort has been made to keep the information in the tables and on this site as accurate as possible, however, neither the publisher, Tarawera Publishing, nor anyone engaged to compile the rates and this site accept any liability for inaccuracies or any loss suffered as a result. It is strongly advised that readers check loan details with providers. The full terms and conditions of this site can be found here.

© Copyright 1997-2021. Tarawera Publishing Ltd. All Rights Reserved.